sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] bug? iptables, ifupdown
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:10:05 -0500
Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [09.03.05 14:41]:
> > I just found out that the line could be correct since we have a dhcp
> > 3.x in our grimoire. The line for dhclient3 is correct except it expects
> > binary name to be dhclient3.
> >
> > Okay, but i still have to ask: What to do? Upgrade dhcp?
>
> Is there an upstream bug to have this fixed? If not, we could patch
> iptables to work with dhclient3, unless a newer version already has
> this.
>
> -sandalle
Eric: By "patch iptables" I hope you meant "patch ifupdown" ;-)
Robert: I'm confused as to what specifically expects the binary to be
named dhclient3: dhcp, or ifupdown? It seems that it should be dhcp,
since the line in ifupdown calls "dhclient".
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpy94FxWpdIj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] bug? iptables, ifupdown,
Eric Sandall, 03/05/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] bug? iptables, ifupdown, flux, 03/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.