sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:43:09 +0100
Am Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:45:17 +0100
schrieb Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be>:
> Is it time to drop support for linux-2.4.x?
> No other major distribution bothers with it now.
> Possibly move it into an unsupported branch?
linux-2.4 on SMGL is at best extremely untested, and thus by definition
broken.
Unless of course, someone using a 2.4 kernel speaks up.
We keep the possibility to _not_ use udev and hal; 2.4 lovers can then still
install the kernel themselves (like several people do with their regular 2.6
kernels anyway).
Alrighty then,
Thomas.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] linux-2.4,
Treeve Jelbert, 02/19/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4,
Eric Sandall, 02/26/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/27/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4,
Eric Sandall, 02/26/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4, George Sherwood, 02/23/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-2.4,
Thomas Orgis, 02/19/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.