sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:57:51 -0500
David Kowis (dkowis AT shlrm.org) wrote [09.01.05 09:41]:
> Why not go with test6? I mean, it's a new release.
> If I had a glitch with my 0.9.6 software I'd call it 0.9.7 and it'd be
> an OMFGbugfix release.
> Just idle thoughts on versioning numbers, I mean, it really doesn't matter.
Because there is absolutely nothing new that will be in it, except for
the things necessary for the ISO to actually install a working system
that were missing in test5. So far in the series, each test iteration is
not just a bugfix but also adds something more in the implementation.
This will literally only be a bugfix, so I feel that giving it a full
version increase to .6 would be something of a misnomer.
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpYcUqHK4EOU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5,
flux, 01/03/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5, flux, 01/03/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5,
flux, 01/04/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM-Announce] ISO 0.10.0-test5, flux, 01/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5,
flux, 01/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5,
David Kowis, 01/05/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5, flux, 01/05/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO 0.10.0-test5,
David Kowis, 01/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.