Public SourceMage Discussion List

[David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>]

That was a pretty good burn. Perhaps old sorcery should have warnings?

flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:

>Jaka Kranjc wrote [08.12.28 14:12]:
>> Nothing funky happened to Sorcery, it just became more strict. There were 
>> always install-info errors (you get them with test sorcery too), but now 
>> they 
>> are fatal if they cause POST_REMOVE (or PRE_REMOVE) to fail.
>> Like I said before, consider this an incentive to finally fix these long 
>> standing bugs. The candidates are easy to find, the fix pretty simple 
>> (just 
>> remember to add a repair file) and Vlad was already working on one for 
>> tar, 
>> so you should also have a reference soon.
>> 
>> LP
>> -- 
>> We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
>> Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
>
><sarcasm>
><flame>
>GCC release of sorcery! WARNING!
></flame>
></sarcasm>
>
>-- 
>Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
>Cauldron wizard and general mage
>Source Mage GNU/Linux
>http://www.sourcemage.org
>_______________________________________________
>SM-Discuss mailing list
>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>!DSPAM:2,495800b777788281845283!

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9. Please excuse my brevity.