sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO
- From: "colin childs" <phoul AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:00:49 -0600
framebuffer is teh sex. but i agree... it shouldnt be in the iso. unnessisary and a little buggy
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:08 PM, David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
Vlad Glagolev wrote:The frame buffer one the iso issue has been raised in the past. And
> JUST PLEASE
>
> p.s. sorry, can't stand it anymore :|
>
every time it's come up, the consensus is to not use framebuffer on the ISO.
Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it.
David
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Love is the law, love under will
-
[SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO,
Vlad Glagolev, 11/24/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO,
David Kowis, 11/24/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO, colin childs, 11/25/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 11/27/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO, flux, 11/27/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] REMOVE IDIOTIC FRAMEBUFFER FROM THE INSTALLATION ISO,
David Kowis, 11/24/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.