Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>]

On Thursday 10 of April 2008 13:56:30 Remko van der Vossen wrote:
> > > > Which *should* pull in mpfr if it has not already been updated to
> > > > 2.3.1.
> > >
> > > uhmn.. (x < 230 or x >= 2.3.1) does not seem to be a tautology...
> >
> > Worked here, feel free to fix it if it's broken. Note that all versions
> > after 2.3.1 will be > 2.3.0 with the above code, which removes the "."
> > characters. So if mpfr 2.3.1 (or newer) is not installed, gcc will force
> > mpfr to be compiled before itself.
>
> I mean that with this code nothing happens if 2.3.0 is installed, which
> might be good enough, but which is not what you said.
Insider info: there is no 2.3.0 ;)
If there was, it would be good enough too.

LP

-- 
We cannot command nature except by obeying her.  --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.