sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 00:54:16 -0700
On Sunday, April 06 2008 19:17:27 Eric Sandall wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 01 2008 21:03:46 Eric Sandall wrote:
> <snip>
>
> I'm not hitting this issue (no fix posted):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32581
>
> Any ideas, or shall I deprecate Ada (for now) and push GCC 4.3.0? I'm in
> favor of this approach, unless there are any real people whom actually use
> this antiquated (invented before computers even existed!) language.
>
> -sandalle
Alright, I now have Ada 4.3.0 compiling on both x86 and x86_64, but using
another bootstrap binary. I'm now working on building our own (and putting
the instructions in HISTORY for future use ;)) and will submit all my GCC
4.3.0 updates to test Real Soon Now(TM).
Note that this will *double* our supported architectures for Ada, which I
hear
many of you do not use, and no one should. ;)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0,
Eric Sandall, 04/01/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0,
Eric Sandall, 04/02/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0, Eric Sandall, 04/07/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0, Eric Sandall, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4.3.0,
Eric Sandall, 04/02/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.