Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:07:19AM -0600, David Kowis wrote:
> Quoting Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>:
> 
> > Hi,
> > what do you think about it, especially Eric?
> > Personally I am happy with only one e section. I do not need more e 
> > sections.
> > Imho, to have more e sections is useless.
> > Of course if you prefer it, np.
> 
> Is there anything that actually conflicts between e16 and e17?
> 
> I kinda like the keywords idea.
> 
I agree with the keywords, iirc most spells that are e16-only mention
this in the (short)description.

Arjan
 
+=======
Source Mage GNU/Linux developer,
http://www.sourcemage.org
Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
http://counter.li.org.
GnuPG Key 79D4B14E = 94AD 3FD1 E259 67ED 632E  2B06 CFBE 1154 79D4 B14E
+===