Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Bearcat M. Sandor" <sourcemage AT feline-soul.com>]

George,

I have that same link too. Should i just delete it?

Also i have:

pngconf.h -> libpng12/pngconf.h
png.h -> libpng12/png.h

which are both from libpng.

Bearcat M. Sandor

On Wednesday 19 September 2007 in an email titled "Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 
2.6.1 integration to test" George Sherwood wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:47:51 -0700
>
>"David Brown" <dmlb2000 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was wondering how many people actually installed glibc 2.6.1 and how
>> much testing and rebuilds of their system they've done. I've got both
>> i386 and x86-64 covered all the way with gnome/xfce4 about 550 spells
>> in all and they all work fine. Is this the case with everyone else?
>
>I have built some where over 300 spells since updating to 2.6.1 with no
>problems.  My only concern is the issue that both Arwed and I ran into
>with symbolic links in the /usr/include directory.  I am not even sure
>where mine came from, but I had a link to /usr/include/asm-generic.
>Glibc 2.6.1 built and installed fine, but I had spells fail due to
>missing includes.  There was just a small error during the install that
>didn't cause a failure.
>
>Other then that problem, I think we are good to go to test.  It might
>only effect a few people and the cause is very well understood.
>
>George
>
>_______________________________________________
>SM-Discuss mailing list
>SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.