sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

[SM-Discuss] [SM_Discuss] Why do we do it this way (was How to write spells that require initial scripts under init.d)

From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <sourcemage AT feline-soul.com>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Discuss] [SM_Discuss] Why do we do it this way (was How to write spells that require initial scripts under init.d)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:35:21 -0600 (MDT)

Folks,

Is there a reason why we use simpleinit-msb? What does it do that the
regular init doesn't to make it worth all this work?

I've been around since the beginning and i don't know why we switched. I
was working on a Kubuntu laptop's scripts the other day and i thought.
"Wow. This is easy compared to Sourcemage."

Bearcat M. Sandor

[SM-Discuss] [SM_Discuss] Why do we do it this way (was How to write spells that require initial scripts under init.d), Bearcat M. Sandor, 09/17/2007
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [SM_Discuss] Why do we do it this way (was How to write spells that require initial scripts under init.d), Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 09/18/2007