sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:52:00 -0300
I got to the conclusion that the current build order for binutils, gcc,
and glibc, is wrong in the case where you want to rebuild the system
with a different version of either of these.
I will not explain the problem, because it's somewhat obvious, and
very long to explain in deep.
The correct build order is:
1) Linux headers
2) binutils
4) gcc (static)
5) glibc
6) gcc
7) binutils
I'm new to SourceMage (a few days), so I'm not sure if that can be
achieved automatically with sorcery, but surely easy to implement.
-
[SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
Ismael Luceno, 11/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
seth, 11/19/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc, Ismael Luceno, 11/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
Andrew Stitt, 11/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
Ismael Luceno, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
seth, 11/21/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc, Ismael Luceno, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
seth, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
Ismael Luceno, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Wrong build order for: linux headers + binutils + gcc + glibc,
seth, 11/19/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.