sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:19:28 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
<snip>
>> Also, we need to loosen up who can make/sign the grimoire tarballs.
>> Right now, I believe it's limited to two people. If they're not around,
>> it won't happen. I'm proposing that any Lead Developer can be allowed to
>> do the releases. If we're that uneasy about giving our Lead's the power
>> to do so alone, have it require two signatures from two different Leads.
>> As long as we open it up some so that we can move forward even if a few
>> leads are out of the picture. Same thing goes for integrations.
>
> This strikes me as "changing project policy to resolve a single component
> issue" and it seriously dillutes the Grimoire Lead's authority over his
> component. I would rather we ask/require the Grimoire Lead to formally
> identify a set of people allowed to sanction/sign releases, be they Leads
> or otherwise. There should be enough of these identified to make sure it
> can happen on time. Right now we frankly have exactly one person who is
> *allowed* to do this (Arwed). Seth has a key in there from when he was QA
> lead but Arwed's never actually said he has the authority to do releases
> (that I've seen).
>
> The PL should also have implicit authority to step in and do the releases
> (or have someone else do them on his authority) if the process identified
> by the Grimoire Lead falls apart due to lack of people/etc.
It was not my intention to undermine the authority, just to make it
easier to get things to happen. This is an excellent idea.
- --
David Kowis
ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to
find easier ways to do something.
- Robert Heinlein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=mAYR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining,
David Kowis, 11/01/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/01/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining, David Kowis, 11/01/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining, Mathieu L., 11/01/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining, Andrew Stitt, 11/02/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 11/02/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Process Streamlining,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.