sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:33:26 +0200
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Due to recent comments in sm-commits, I would like to bring back the
> discussion about patches in grimoire we had in may.
> I have been indeed asked several informations (origin of the patches,
> authors, etc...) about some patches I've committed some day ago, and
> this highlights imho the lack of consistency in the use of patches.
> HISTORY can't contain all these informations, so we do need to do
> something about that.
> Therefore I would like to start a wiki page to sum up what we discussed
> earlier, and then we could end this discussion. Everybody agrees on the
> need of a better handling of patches ?
Agreed.
Maybe start with just defining a few information comments that should be
put in all new patches that outline exactly the stuff you were asked,
like origin, author, applied upstream, ...
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
David Kowis, 08/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/29/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells, David Kowis, 08/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
David Kowis, 08/29/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in spells,
Flavien Bridault, 08/29/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.