sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:27:17 +0300
On Monday 14 August 2006 23:13, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
[snip]
> I think removing UPDATED whenever a spell is updated or gets a new
> PATCHLEVEL/SECURITY_PATCH is the safer solution, even if it'll take some
> time.
Removing UPDATED from those spells that already have PATCHLEVEL is considered
safe, then? There are 90 of these in test at the moment.
--
Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
Attachment:
pgpT3FcGrXEjP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Flavien Bridault, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Flavien Bridault, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?, Juuso Alasuutari, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Flavien Bridault, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?, Eric Sandall, 08/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Juuso Alasuutari, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] UPDATED ready for removal?,
Flavien Bridault, 08/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.