sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:10:53 -0500
On Jul 31, Jason Flatt [jflatt AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 11:33, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> [ s n i p ]
> >
> > For misc I'm essentially converting things to git repos as people ask for
> > them, since there's a lot of dead weight in there and it's not clear who
> > owns what as things have moved around. If someone can give a clear
> > authoritative mapping of things in there to where they should end up (or
> > if
> > they're still used) I'll go with that, but when I asked before I only got
> > a
> > few scattered replies. In any case there doesn't seem to be harm in
> > converting them as they're needed, it doesn't take long to do.
> >
> [ s n i p ]
>
> I've gone back through the e-mails and added comments and authors for each
> item which was mentioned. Hopefully I didn't put any words into anybody's
> mouths, but I merely copied and pasted from the archive.
I guess I missed a couple of those replies. chrootgen I know Karsten said
has been incorporated into the cauldron repo already.
If we only have 3 things under misc I'll probably make them their own repos
anyway.
> archspecs: Should be separate (Andra? Levstik)
> chrootgen: should be its own repository (Andrew Stitt)
> contrib:
> convert2smgl: This can go in misc, it is only a helper script that is
> nowhere
> near finished. (Eric Sandall)
> doc:
> enthrall: should be separate (Andra? Levstik)
> installward: ignore (Andrew Stitt)
> ircbots: under a general misc (Andra? Levstik)
> prometheus: already imported to git (Jeremy Blosser)
> quill: already imported to git (Jeremy Blosser)
> scripts: General misc (Andra? Levstik)
> zengarden: ignore (Andrew Stitt)
>
> As for my comments, the stuff in doc should be on the Web site somewhere.
> I'll
> check later today or tomorrow to make sure and if not, add them. Even
> though
> I have no code in scripts, I would like to keep what is there as I think
> there could be quite a few nuggets that would be a shame to lose. The only
> thing in contrib is a copy of Installwatch 0.6.2, so that can probably
> safely
> go away.
Attachment:
pgpgt03BtduW4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] git decision,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision,
Jason Flatt, 07/31/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision, Jeremy Blosser, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision,
Jason Flatt, 07/31/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] git decision,
Jeremy Blosser, 07/31/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.