sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: David Brown <dmlb2000 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:24:46 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Brown wrote:
> On 4/26/06, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As Jeremy Blosser (emrys) has requested a vote of the Team Leads if his
>> proposal (attached) is seconded (it was, by David Kowis
>> (dkowis/kittah)), we have here a vote. :)
>>
>> I believe Jeremy (correct me if I'm wrong) would like this vote to
>> follow the guidelines attached, which means:
>> * All votes must be GPG signed by a valid key listed on
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/keysigning
>> * Only Team Leads have a binding vote
>> * Other developers may post a vote, but it is advisory only
>> * Votes go to the mailing list (sm-discuss) with a +1 (yes) ,+/-0
>> (abstain) ,-1 (no)
>> * At least 51% of the Leads must vote for the vote to be valid
>> * At least 51% of the voting Leads must vote +1 for the issue to pass
>> * Non-Leads may veto the process after the vote has finished
>> * At least 51% of all developers (Lead + General) must vote
>> * At least 67% of the voting developers must vote +1 for the veto to
>> pass
>
> I think 'Simple Majority' or 'Two-thirds Majority' [0] should be the
> terms used instead of raw percentages since if it's 50.5% for and
> 49.5% against in a 'simple majority' case that would pass...
>
> Unless 51% is actually what you want...
>
> - David Brown
In the documents "Simple Majority" is defined as 51% and "Super
Majority" as 67%, so I used those percentages to keep it short.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFET9cNHXt9dKjv3WERAgQSAKCMNcOl/1h5/js24ObvrsatZygFKgCfU/aN
1yfYCnurAV8eKgEFVEYJNmA=
=nEQ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
Eric Sandall, 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
David Brown, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Eric Sandall, 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
David Brown, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Eric Sandall, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/26/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
David Brown, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, David Kowis, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Eric Sandall, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Mathieu L., 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Juuso Alasuutari, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Robin Cook, 04/26/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote, Eric Sandall, 04/27/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Project Organization Policy Vote,
David Brown, 04/26/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.