sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:30:01 -0600
On Feb 28, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) [jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org] wrote:
> As far as this particular case, I agree you should have consulted first as
s/should have consulted/should have been consulted/
Why do I always leave out the important words.
> the section maintainer, and if there was disagreement on what to do then at
> least the grimoire team lead should have been engaged as well to help
> figure it out. I don't think Eric was trying to act in a PL capacity in
> doing something like this, one spell's versioning frankly isn't significant
> enough to call for that. Also I think that dependences which are now
> broken are obviously bugs and the person that created them should be
> responsible to see they get fixed.
>
> As a long time e16 user myself, things I would hope are considered while
> you guys figure out if this should stay as one or two spells include:
>
> - Upstream wants to allow people to install both versions at once, ideas on
> how can we support this using just one spell?
>
> - Certain things need to depend on either e16 or e17 and we need a way to
> handle that, again, preferably while allowing both to be installed at
> once.
Attachment:
pgpNhUkyo2yEF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Ladislav Hagara, 02/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 02/28/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] enlightenment, e17, e16, Eric Sandall, 02/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.