sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: neuron <vlmarek AT volny.cz>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:54:25 +0100
> > Eric Sandall wrote:
> > I'd say that sounds fine (I'd even go so far as to say merge apache2
> > and apache, dropping apache2 ;)). This would also go for mysql, IMO.
> Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> I'd agree if nobody's using Apache 1 at least among those reading this
> list and the user list. That would also mean getting rid of
> apache-mod_ssl. Finally, that would mean getting rid of Apache 1 modules
> (e.g. mod_python 2.x).
I'm using apache 1, since I also need subversion. I thought that you
can't use apache2 if you use svn, because of some problem with apr and
apr-utils ( there are several apr spells also ). But I haven't
investigated yet, so I'm probably just plain wrong here.
--
neuron
Attachment:
pgpFmCJLXMlhB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
David Kowis, 01/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release, David Kowis, 01/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
Eric Sandall, 01/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
neuron, 01/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/18/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release, Ladislav Hagara, 01/19/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
neuron, 01/18/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2.2.0 Release,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/16/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.