Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] Please update your perforce-client

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: 'Jeremy Blosser' <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] Please update your perforce-client
  • Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:43:32 -0500

I'm forwarding this for those developers that don't watch p4 commit mails;
please update your perforce-client spell install to maintain server
compatibility.

----- Forwarded message from Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org> -----

Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:27:56 +0100
From: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 65946 by David Braaten for review

Thanks George.

Tony

George J. Sherwood wrote:
>If no one else is running off to this, I will get done later tonight. I
>have the X86 version updated now and will submit. Hopefully later the
>powerpc and X86_64 versions
>
>George
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tony Smith [mailto:tony AT smee.org]
>>Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:10 PM
>>To: Eric Sandall
>>Cc: Ladislav Hagara; David Braaten; Andrew ruskie Levstik; Andrew Stitt;
>>Arjan Bouter; Arwed von Merkatz; duane_malcolm; Gareth Clay; George J.
>>Sherwood; Jason Flatt; Jeremy Blosser; Maurizio Boriani; Robin Cook; Seth
>>Woolley; Thomas Houssin; Unet; vladimir_marek
>>Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 65946 by David Braaten for review
>>
>>Looks fairly sucky.
>>
>>It seems I've been remiss about patching our server and it was a little
>>old. There had been some merge fixes since the last time I updated it
>>and that's probably (partly) what bit you here.
>>
>>The merge code is shared between client and server, so although I've
>>upgraded the server to the latest 2005.1 build, we need to do the same
>>for the clients.
>>
>>I'm going to be out of the office for a few days, but if someone could
>>update the perforce-client spell to the latest build that should do the
>>trick.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Tony
>>
>>Eric Sandall wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Change 65946 by david_braaten@david_braaten-proteus on 2005/09/16
>>>>>08:17:56
>>>>>bug 9408.
>>>>>Affected files ...
>>>>>
>>>>>==== //sgl/grimoires/test/graphics/yafray/DETAILS#2 (xtext) ====
>>>>>
>>>>>@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
>>>>>SPELL=yafray
>>>>>+ VERSION=0.0.8
>>>>>VERSION=0.0.6-2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Seems some problem with integration.
>>>>Now it has VERSION twice.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wow...I didn't even notice that, thanks. ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>>>==== //sgl/grimoires/test/graphics/yafray/HISTORY#3 (text) ====
>>>>>
>>>>>2005-02-02 Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
>>>>>- * PRE_BUILD: Apply patch
>>>>>- * gcc-3.4.patch: Patch to fix Bug #8177
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The same problem.
>>>>Info was removed but the patch has remained.
>>>
>>>
>>>I've had that with other packages as well (e.g. clisp and the USEGCC2
>>>file).
>>>
>>>For this one, I get:
>>>$ p4 integ -f //sgl/grimoires/test/graphics/yafray/gcc-3.4.patch
>>>gcc-3.4.patch
>>>//sgl/grimoires/test/graphics/yafray/gcc-3.4.patch - no permission for
>>>operation on file(s).
>>>
>>>- -sandalle
>>>
>>>- --
>>>Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
>>>eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
>>>http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
>>>http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>>iD8DBQFDKykzHXt9dKjv3WERAtS2AKCE5GXo8nVKJ43d4uPmALJ5nx9N+gCeNyjI
>>>0YJun8AVlOejnwBxlh91RxI=
>>>=RzAq
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>!DSPAM:432c83175291312910621!
>
>


----- End forwarded message -----

Attachment: pgp0J1bUFd6Go.pgp
Description: PGP signature



  • [SM-Discuss] Please update your perforce-client, 'Jeremy Blosser', 09/18/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page