sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support
- Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:00:13 -0400
This is interesting:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/31/2045201
It pretty much repeats our discussion in this thread, with arguments
from both sides.
I especially like this fragment:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/31/2045201#13450029
and this one
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/31/2045201#13450266
There are of course pieces in support of signatures, but I'm going to
leave searching for them for those interested :-).
Sergey.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 09/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Eric Sandall, 09/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.