Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] cast arguments implying -c

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] cast arguments implying -c
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:08:41 -0700

You may know that theres some arguments to cast for one-time adjustments
to compile flags. These are --cflags, --cxxflags, --ldflags, and
--no-opts. A bug [0] has recently come in suggesting that all of those
options, similar to '-r', imply the -c (force recompile, dont resurrect)
option.

What do people think? Worthwhile? Most people thought having -r imply
-c was a good idea so I think this would be too. Otherwise the options
are meaningless and give a false sense of them doing something.

Just to point out the other side of the argument, one could say (and
document) that the arguments only bear meaning when you are compiling
something. You may cast a slew of things, and for those spells that
cannot be resurrected, the additional cflags are used, for the resurrects
they're ignored. A cast without -c can consist of a mix of resurrects
and compiles.

I really could go either way on this, I would like to get the opinion
of the userbase on this issue. Feel free to discuss here or in the
bug itself.

-Andrew

[0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8739

--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | acedit at armory.com |
|Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpdyhlKHcXH3.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page