sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:09:34 -0700 (MST)
David,
This looks awesome! i can't wait to try it out.
Currently, when the Linux spell is cast, any directly dependant spells are
triggered (oprofile, alsa-driver etc.) When they are, they are compiled
against the current (just dispelled) kernel. So one has to reboot and then
recast them.
Given your work on the linux-new spell, is this problem alleviated?
Thanx,
Bearcat
>
> I'm hoping to get linux-new to a state where it can be integrated into
> linux, soon
>
> Here's some useful info about the spell
>
> Features:
> 1. dependancy checking using make
> 2. viewing patches that only apply to the base kernel you chose
> so unless you go patch crazy the patches will most-likely apply
> 3. required post patching
> this is mainly for security fixes and fixing overloaded kernels so
> they actually compile
> 4. having multiple kernels with different patches in different states on
> the same machine...
> this is done by saving the persistant vars to the kernel tree
> 5. help dialogs explaining what the patches are and what contain
> 6. Options menu
> 1. pulling config files from different locations
> 2. arch selection
> 3. source tree clean options
>
> Some things you might not expect:
> 1. updating
> linux-new doesn't update with `sorcery upgrade`. This is because
> I
> didn't want to stop the update process. The fact that there is no
> guaranty
> that a config file will apply to a newer kernel even if it's along the
> same
> update path is why I chose this approach.
> in order to update linux-new you have to cast -r -c linux-new, and
> select an old source tree so that either menuconfig defconfig
> oldconfig
> whatever runs to create a valid config file.
> how linux-new updates is this, selecting a LATEST_* anything will
> keep
> the source tree up-to-date. if you select a latest patch the base
> kernel
> that the patch depends on will override any latest selection of the
> base
> kernel, this means if you select the latest 2.6 and ac patches then
> the
> latest 2.6 kernel updates linux-new won't try to apply the old ac
> patch to
> the new 2.6 kernel.
>
> 2. no manual kernel version selection
> I'm going to fight this one, but I don't know if I'm going to
> win...
> I really don't thing this is needed with the system that is in place,
> now.
> that's my only argument against it.
>
> Any feed back would be helpful, thanks
>
> - David Brown
> dmlb2000*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> The most personalized portal on the Web!
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 03/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push, Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/29/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 03/29/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 03/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push, Paul Mahon, 03/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] linux-new -> linux final push, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 03/31/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.