sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] openoffice compilation ?
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:54:56 -0500
If you use Gnome you might try the ooo-build in gnome2-apps, which is
Ximians version of OpenOffice. Though it will only compile with gcc
3.3.3 so if you are running devel with gcc 3.4.2 it will fail.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 18:25 +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Hi everyone !
>
> I wondered why openoffice spell seems to be given up (version 1.1.0) ? I
> guess
> it is very difficult to get it compiling (for instance because of java ??)
> ?
> I tried the spell several months ago but it failed all the time.
> I know I can use openoffice-bin instead, but it only uses the english
> tarball. :( It is quite a pity since I have so to install openoffice by
> myself and it is not tracked by sorcery...
> Overmore, I fear that people might think that we still use openoffice 1.1.0
> since it is what is written in the SMGL page on distrowatch.com.
>
> Is there anything I can do ??
>
> Regards,
>
> Flavien "Vlaaad" Bridault.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] openoffice compilation ?,
Flavien Bridault, 10/23/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openoffice compilation ?, Robin Cook, 10/23/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] openoffice compilation ?, neuron, 10/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.