sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:33:28 +0200
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:04:53PM +1200, Robin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:58, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > unpack binutils from compile cache -- do you know when it started
> > happening? might be the new gcc spells, but I don't think they're in
> > test grimiore yet.
> For me, i think it was very recently, like when I did a system-update a few
> days ago.
>
> Shouldn't binutils be able to work without 'ar', if it is the source of it.
Not possible, same as gcc that needs a C compiler for bootstrapping, the
build toolchain is dependant on itself.
The /usr/bin/ar disappearance happened here too and i tracked it down to
pnet doing some odd stuff causing it to get tracked, but that got fixed
ten days ago. To see what spell caused it, try greeping for /usr/bin/ar
in your install logs.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Robin, 07/11/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils, Robin, 07/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Eric Womack, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Seth Alan Woolley, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Robin, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Robin, 07/12/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils, Eric Sandall, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Robin, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Robin, 07/12/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling binutils,
Seth Alan Woolley, 07/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.