sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xdelta in sorcery
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 03:33:47 -0700
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> Its not often we remove a feature from sorcery, but here goes...
>
> Would anyone be bothered if I got rid of the xdelta "feature"? Its not
> currently used (to my knowledge) and its fairly old moldy code. We can
> also (I hear) get basically the same functionality on the fly with rsync
> for any two related tarballs, whereas with xdelta we have to specifically
> provide an xdelta patch between two tarballs.
Sounds good to me if we can get the same functionality.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] xdelta in sorcery,
Andrew, 05/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xdelta in sorcery, VladimĂr Marek, 05/31/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xdelta in sorcery,
Eric Sandall, 05/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xdelta in sorcery, Ladislav Hagara, 05/31/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.