sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies"
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies"
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:59:05 +0200
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> We should probably discuss possible solutions to Bug #5957[0]. ;)
>
> -sandalle
>
> [0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5957
1. indirect dependencies should be relied on, otherwise every single
gnome program would have a list of 30+ dependencies, which just isn't
manageable. (I thought we agreed on that before, otherwise we're
missing about a thousand dependencies on X11-LIBS ;)
2. having dispel refuse to dispel spells that others depend on sounds
like a good solution, with a switch --force to override that
behaviour
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies", Andrew, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Eric Sandall, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] The story of "Oh, my dependencies",
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.