Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>]

If you are looking for something to do this would be very much appreciated.

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:24:59PM +0200, Martin Ruderer wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 2004 12:15:52 -0700
> Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com> wrote:
> 
> > Theres a couple of ways I can do this:
> > 1) modify every function to have an extra argument somewhere, then fix
> > all the callers to do the right thing.
> 
> You could do so but I don't really see the advantages in not having the
> wrapper function. It does neither improve clarity nor should it have an
> impact on speed.
> 
> > 2) like 1 but rename the functions, and keep the existing functions as
> > wrappers that use DEPENDS_STATUS 
> 
> I'd go for that. (And I've been doing so in sorcery before)
> 
> > 3) change the value of DEPENDS_STATUS before calling the function
> 
> I'd strongly encourage the use of that one. 
> 
> 
> my 2 cents. ;-)
> -- 
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt                           | astitt at sourcemage.org    |
|irc: afrayedknot                          | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus    |                             |
|Sorcery Team Lead, Porting Team Lead      |                             |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl                    | ftp://t.armory.com          |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus       |                             |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------