Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

I personaly prefer gconfig.

On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 13:42, Andrew ruskie Levstik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:14:05 -0500
> Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Can we get a choice to run menuconfig or gconfig? I really dislike
> > gconfig and I get warnings when it starts to run, can we get a choice to
> > use menuconfig as well?
> > 
> > Jeremy
> > 
> 
> I agree get rid of that s****** gconfig or qconfig etc... or atleast simply 
> ask what one likes to use...
> 
> - -- 
> For all the knowledge...
> I will prevail...
> If I fail nothing is left...
> All is lost...
> Never to be seen again...
> Nevermore...
> 
> - --
> 
> Key ID = 32FE2034
> Key fingerprint = EF36 041B E2A5 4E6F 7B3E  6B45 C0F2 E234 32FE 2034
> 
> - --
> 
> - -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GAT d? s+:+++ a? C++++>$ UL+++ P L+++ E---- W+ N+ o? K? !w O+ !M
> V PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+++ 5+++ !X R++ tv++ b+++ DI? !D G e h! !r !y+
> - ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFAeuMMwPLiNDL+IDQRArlPAJ9qOqbYA5Y+Wk3cepUC7mGGv57pYwCfb7Ht
> bcUbSWR0MI/w1J41oy+kYkk=
> =0VTP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-- 
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part