sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:06:58 -0500 (CDT)
I would assume so. x.org is just a fork from just before the licese
changes went into cvs. We will just have to see what happens in the future
though. Nvidia may take sides, or choose to support both. Or the forks may
stay compatiable enough where a single driver will continue to work with
both.
-casey
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, [iso-8859-2] Vladimír Marek wrote:
> > i just submitted a xorg spell for the X.org X server[1], a full
> > replacement
> > for XFree86. It works fine here (with some quirks in gnome 2.6 related
> > to keyboard which seems to be a gnome bug), so everyone is encouraged to
> > test it. The spell is in devel and test for now.
> Great, I'm looking forward trying this out
>
> I can't find it on the x.org site, but don't you know, is X.org server
> supposed to run with binary nvidia drivers ?
>
> --
> Neuron
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies, Robert Helgesson, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies,
-={|TooManyMirrors|}=-, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies,
Vladimír Marek, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies, Casey Harkins, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xorg spell and sorcery dependencies, Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.