Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - [SM-Discuss] OpenOffice

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: John T Copeland <johnc AT neto.com>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [SM-Discuss] OpenOffice
  • Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:16:34 -0500

While re-building my system after a move to kernel 2.6.4, OpenOffice-1.1.0
won't recompile. I get the following error:

Making: ../../unxlngi4.pro/obj/semaphor.obj
gcc -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc
-I../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I.
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/dont_use_stl
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/external
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxlngi4/inc -I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solenv/inc
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/res
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/unxlngi4.pro/inc/dont_use_stl
-I/usr/src/oo_1.1_src/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/java/j2sdk/include
-I/usr/java/j2sdk/include/linux
-I/usr/java/j2sdk/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.
-I../../res -I. -march=athlon-xp -mmmx -mfpmath=sse -msse -m3dnow -pipe -O3
-pipe -DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DINTEL -DCVER=C300 -D_USE_NAMESPACE
-DGLIBC=2 -DX86 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1
-DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DSUPD=645
-DBUILD=8693 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE
-DEXCEPTIONS_OFF -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSRX645 -DMULTITHREAD
-o ../../unxlngi4.pro/obj/semaphor.o semaphor.c
semaphor.c:88: error: parse error before "_pthread_descr"
semaphor.c:88: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
semaphor.c:89: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngi4.pro/obj/semaphor.obj'

Anybody got any ideas.

Other modules that did not recompile are:
GConf
gnome-vfs
These two are required by gnucash. gnucash did recompile and executes OK
with
the compiles from 2.4.x.

These failures aren't killing me cause the 2.4.x executables still work OK.
Just like to have a "clean" system. Otherwise 2.6.x is go for me!

JohnC







  • [SM-Discuss] OpenOffice, John T Copeland, 04/05/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page