sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jose Bernardo Silva" <jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com>
- To: dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net, sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 15:22:54 +0000
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:10:55 -0500, Paul wrote
> I recompiled the kernel with no agpart and no DRI (or is it called
> DRM in there...), and still X insisted on compiling DRM :/
>
> I finaly solved the problem by getting the SIS stuff to compile
> properly. I needed to
> ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.4/include/video/sisfb.h
/usr/src/linux-2.6.4/include/linux/sisfb.h
>
> I'm not sure what a bug report would say... is anyone able to build X
> 4.4 w/o DRM at all?
>
> --
> De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Well, that reminds me that the SiS drivers (http://www.winischhofer.net) have
different instructions when compiling for kernel 2.6.x and for kernels 2.4.x.
For 2.4.x, it was needed to have the sisfb.h file in
/usr/src/linux/include/video/, in 2.6.x, it was in
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/. I'll try your solution tomorrow.
What I did to get X to compile without DRI/DRM? I edited hosts.def, and
disabled the option there. It seems the dialog interface isn't working that
well...
---
Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://counter.li.org #245602
http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com
-
[SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4,
Paul, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4,
Paul, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4, Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4,
Paul, 04/05/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4, Robert Helgesson, 04/05/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xfree86 4.4,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 04/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.