sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] distcc and Unsermake
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:06:11 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:34, Jose Bernardo Silva wrote:
> http://www.csh.rit.edu/slashdot/distcc.html
>
> Doesn't say if he is using "--enable-final" in KDE's configure, but he
> makes a very good case for distcc. Maybe we could start using Unsermake
> too? Anyone has any experience with it?
>
> ---
> Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
> jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
> http://counter.li.org #245602
> http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
> jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com
>
it says memory usage for compiles never went above 60MB, so if kde was
compiled as part of the tests then --enable-final definitely wasn't used.
I turned off distcc for kde due to it using --enable-final, it is noted as a
problem in the distcc FAQ [0]and I found it increased compile times here, and
it even caused prometheus to timeout (30 min timeouts) during any kde compile
on my pII 300 cluster.
If you want distcc then add a configure option to every spell that uses
- --enable-final so those of us with experience of the problem can still
either
turn of distcc or --enable-final or both.
[0]http://distcc.samba.org/faq.html#enable-final
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAatBW8fSufZR6424RAmMqAJ47+wiSaext92trivuFF0a4xTaUaQCfUh05
ML2xHjTzYfoVvZrjPBAbe8E=
=HscO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] distcc and Unsermake,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 03/31/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distcc and Unsermake,
Hamish Greig, 03/31/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] distcc and Unsermake, Jose Bernardo Silva, 03/31/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] distcc and Unsermake,
Hamish Greig, 03/31/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.