sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:42:39 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
because coreutils has a crappy hostname, to avoid a trigger on net-tools, the
hostname script was changed.
If I/we had more time/cared more it could/should have had the Makefile edited
to stop installation of hostname.
Hamish/drmoriarty
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:43, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>:
> > We modified the init scripts to support either hostname type. The
> > coreutils one is the bad one, I believe. I _thought_ we already
> > modified coreutils to dump hostname from its list of stuff to install so
> > that net-tools got its good one in.
> >
> > coreutils doesn't need to depend on net-tools. net-tools is part of the
> > basesystem. More exactly, coreutils doesn't actually depend on
> > net-tools anyways, so it would simply be incorrect.
> >
> > Seth
>
> I thought we already had as well, but looking at coreutils' history, I see
> only the following reference to hostname:
>
> 2003-11-07 hgg <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
> * BUILD,coreutils-ls-bug.patch: fix bug in ls
> * POST_INSTALL: remove trigger hack for net-tools, hostname script
> has b
> een fixed
> so it can use coreutils hostname
>
> And the DETAILS of coreutils says that it installs hostname.
>
> Sounds like we modified net-tools to re-install hostname, which seems to
> bear out in net-tools' history as the following three entries:
>
> 2003-11-07 hgg <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
> * TRIGGERS: remove now the hostname script has been fixed to be
> compatible with coreutils hostname
>
> 2003-07-28 Arwed v. Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
> updated to new init system
> hostname.sh is now installed by init.d
>
> 2003-07-18 hgg <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
> Add TRIGGER on coreutils as they both provide hostname but this
> one works
>
> So it sounds like we, at one point, modified coreutils to either not
> install hostname or to install an up-to-date version of hostname which was
> compatible with net-tools' hostname, yet I see nowhere in our code for
> coreutils to do such a thing. Ideas?
>
> -sandalle
- --
IRC nick: drmoriarty
SMGL co-conspirator
# Do You SMGL!?
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without reading
Please use text only
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAEMJn8fSufZR6424RAlQiAJ9BT1ZQ2FxrRAjrrxE4YYxRwm7QCQCdGNG0
7U+E4aRLGmrLLjwM7c3cEE8=
=lMxZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Robin Sheat, 01/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost, Seth Alan Woolley, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Paul, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Eric Sandall, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Paul, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Eric Sandall, 01/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost, Hamish Greig, 01/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Eric Sandall, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Seth Alan Woolley, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Paul, 01/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Hostname getting lost,
Eric Sandall, 01/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.