Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] db md5sum

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] db md5sum
  • Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:47:36 -0500

The problem is in the "update_spell" script that I used to generate checksum before submitting revision #27 of the file (change set 20200, http://www.smee.org:8080/@md=d&cd=//sgl/devel/grimoire/http/mozilla/&cdf=//sgl/devel/grimoire/http/mozilla/DETAILS&c=gmt@//20200?ac=10). So, I'll just update the devel grimoire and then integrate into test.

Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:

Wrong thread, sorry...

I finished the investigation on Mozilla and DB. I downloaded both today and compared them to what I had when the DETAILS files where generated (or close to that time).

Mozilla's 1.5 tarballs that I have didn't change, the good bz2 tarball has checksum 9d59651eac39a95da756d38fe5385896 and without bz2 it is 9c7847a5195ee37c85be4d15babf1331. The one in the DETAILS has 4100aca73502a080f3e7a9c80c6d94f2 and I don't have this tarball. Anyone?

Berkeley DB's 4.2.50 tarballs are in fact different. The only file that has changed between last week and today is a Visual Studio build file. The diff follows below.
Tarball checksums are:
old tar.gz bf6709868be905f2287a46710d3a4cf6
old tar 7d0c2538aa41c0f28ef73f574329dd52
new tar.gz 644522fe89c565ec10c6d2e2d010227b
new tar e385907508ef4886ae5561bc5127e725







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page