sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 20:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sergey A. Lipnevich said:
> I don't like using dots for anything but versions and suffixes (because
> it would be harder for Sorcery to recognize where tyhe version ends ;-)
> ), hence the question: did you consider smgl-version-arch.iso, or (IMHO
> even better) smgl-arch-version.iso? Just a thought.
No, I hadn't thought of doing that, but it's not a bad idea either, but
I'd rather smgl-<version>-<arch>.iso so that they would all be sorted by
version number.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming,
Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming,
Andrew, 06/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming, Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming, Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming, Eric Sandall, 06/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SMGL ISO naming,
Andrew, 06/27/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.