Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] md5sum for xfs patch

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
  • To: Duane Malcolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>
  • Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] md5sum for xfs patch
  • Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 22:11:34 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I went ahead and changed the value in devel for 2.4.20

Then I pulled the linux spell up into test and stable. Stable should have
the new INSTALL_ROOT hacks from zero in as well as newer kernel versions
and updated md5s now (or whenever the tarballs get updated).

Hope that helps, and thanks for reporting.

Seth

On Sat, 31 May 2003, Seth Woolley wrote:

> Well, curiously that's one of the few things my scripts don't check
> because the linux spell checks the md5s internally. I'll need to change
> that.
>
> The xfs people are known to do this kind of change the source behavior
> without changing the version number though. All our md5sums are on the
> uncompressed object, FYI, so you'll have to uncompress it before running
> the md5sum on it.
>
> Another workaround is to set MD5SUM_DL to off, ask_abort, or ask_ignore
> instead of to "on" (default) in your /etc/sorcery/local/config.
>
> You can also change the following file:
>
> /var/lib/sorcery/codex/*/kernels/linux/patches/xfs
>
> to have MD5S[0]=064261cdefdf1b6a7c2046ebe7f95e8f
>
> # bzcat /var/spool/sorcery/xfs-2.4.20-all-i386.bz2 | md5sum | cut -d' ' -f1
> 064261cdefdf1b6a7c2046ebe7f95e8f
>
> instead of the now incorrect value: 1f3736ef74500b724782b33789239a66
>
> and that should do it.
>
> Apparently they changed it April 6, 2003.
>
> I wonder if W0rf is paying attention to this list... I'll let him know if
> he isn't.
>
> Seth
>
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Duane Malcolm wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I compile the linux kernel with the xfs patch it complains the
> > MD5SUM is wrong. In previous installations it doesn't worry about this
> > but in my latest fresh install it stops the casting/compilation.
> >
> > I tried to find the correct MD5SUM but with no luck. Can anyone suggest
> > how I can get around this problem??
> >
> > Cheers, Duane.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
>
> --
> Seth Alan Woolley <seth at tautology.org>, SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Key id 7BEACC7D = 2978 0BD1 BA48 B671 C1EB 93F7 EDF4 3CDF 7BEA CC7D
> Full Key at seth.tautology.org and pgp.mit.edu. info: www.gnupg.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: Signature made Sat May 31 21:45:42 2003 PDT using DSA key ID 7BEACC7D
> gpg: Good signature from "Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>"
>
>

- --
Seth Alan Woolley <seth at tautology.org>, SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id 7BEACC7D = 2978 0BD1 BA48 B671 C1EB 93F7 EDF4 3CDF 7BEA CC7D
Full Key at seth.tautology.org and pgp.mit.edu. info: www.gnupg.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+2YsK7fQ833vqzH0RAv0YAKC2Fcov6F7LrzMqnl/5G8sRRmiHqwCdH7mi
CGxOuXRxFFPZ/xOsW/59eJM=
=0jH5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page