Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>]

Robert Helgesson said:
> On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 08:00:38 -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> I think "status" should be required, though for a few scripts (such as
>> random)
>> it is nonsense.
>
> I agree. Status should be in all scripts, if status is unimplemented in
> the script it should give exit code 100 or something.
>
> --
> /     Robert Helgesson     |--    rycee AT home.se     --\
> \-- GPG Key ID: 41E95A5B --|   http://www.rycee.cx/   /

Nay, 42 is the number thou wantest most!

-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>From spencero AT mail.utexas.edu  Fri May  2 18:54:39 2003
Return-Path: <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
Delivered-To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FF720048
        for <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Fri,  2 May 2003 18:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 19573 invoked by uid 0); 2 May 2003 22:54:31 -0000
Received: from cs6668187-148.austin.rr.com (HELO 192.168.5.2)
        (spencero AT 66.68.187.148)
        by umbs-smtp-2 with SMTP; 2 May 2003 22:54:31 -0000
From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] freetype update
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 17:53:00 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <200305020330.00230.spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
        <1051884677.13549.3.camel@Chronos>
        <20030502142133.GA21417@Otherland>
In-Reply-To: <20030502142133.GA21417@Otherland>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305021753.00971.spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
X-BeenThere: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public SourceMage Discussion List  <sm-discuss.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 22:54:39 -0000

On Friday 02 May 2003 09:21 am, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> What _could_ help is removing /etc/fonts/fonts.conf and recasting
> fontconfig to get the new default font configuration file.


Unfortunately, this did not help. I am at a loss for what to do. I don't 
understand much about fonts beyond TTF. Helvetica on my system is in the 
75dpi and 100dpi folders on my system. Are those Type1 fonts? Is there 
something I need to do to rebuild them?

Spencer