Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

ooops, nope, it was decided that X wouldn't be included as depends.
Perhaps that should be amended to apps which don't use X for a GUI
should include as a depends, or if it's optional?

On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 23:27, Casey Harkins wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2003, Dufflebunk wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 22:52, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > > I tried pulling just the relevant spells into the chroot environment by
> > > processing their install logs. With a few tweaks to take care of some of
> > > the aliens, this worked until I tried to rebuild in the chroot. Some of
> > > these spells had grown dependent on the X11 libraries (though their
> > > dependency info in /var/state/sorcery/depends did not reflect this
> > > dependency).
> > You should probably file bugs about these, if the spells lack the
> > depends info in them.
> 
> So all x apps should depend either implicitly or explicity on xfree86? If
> so, I'm sure there are quite a few that should. The problems I was having
> was with the editors (vim, jed) providing an optional X interface if the
> libraries exist when they are built, they'll both need optional depends on
> xfree86.
<snip>
-- 


Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. 
-----------------
PGP public key at 
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part