Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Developer Key Signing

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • Cc: Wyatt Draggoo <wyatt AT draggoo.com>
  • Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Source Mage Developer Key Signing
  • Date: 02 Apr 2003 10:03:10 -0500

Yeah, after all, I don't have any ID that verifies that I'm Dufflebunk
;)

On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 09:45, Geoffrey Derber wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> | Not that I'm opposed to key-signing, but isn't the point of a key-signing
> | party to physically presesnt some sort of evidence you are who you
> are? We
> | has one at a local LUG where everyone brought their passports and drivers'
> | licenses, and each verified the others, and *then* signed their keys.
> |
> That's why when you sign it you indicate how much checking you did, for
> this you could leave it at 0 which is pretty much a 'no comment' answer,
> more appropriate might be a 1, for no checking at all, or if you manage
> to figure out some method for verification, a 2 for casual checking but
> not very rigorous might be appropriate.
>
> The 3 level would be for the passport, drivers license, etc, which we
> would never have.
>
> Geoff
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE+iveNHBxk9YxVu58RApxvAJ4rzBXSAnXXpCPqtpyCZXparDpE1gCgs1cE
> /LJyONxuC2tJQ/gpxnV4lHU=
> =2BFp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page