Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] samba in xinetd?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: nealbirch <nealbirch AT attbi.com>
  • To: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
  • Cc: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] samba in xinetd?
  • Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:04:29 -0500

Jeremy Kolb wrote:
can it be moved to initd then, or can we get a choice?

Jeremy

Dufflebunk wrote:

Samba via xinetd always generates lots of warnings in my log so I've
always run it from init. You might try a SIGHUP instead of a normal kill
to xinetd.

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 18:07, Jeremy Kolb wrote:

ever since samba was moved to being invoked by xinetd i have had really weird problems. swat reports that samba is not turned on and i can't access my shares, but i can mount other peoples shares. but i can only mount some of them, for some reason i can only access win2k and xp shares when i put the samba logging level to 2 or more. this is really bizarre and i don't know why this is happening but it started as soon as samba was switched to xinetd. im thinking this might have be a bad idea (or maybe the scripts are screwy?). also to restart samba requires that you restart xinetd (i haven't found a better way to do this but im sure that there is).

I would say, we should have a choice. I havent' even tried to check samba before today, but it's hosed on my machine too. argh... have to work on it later this week...


--
"You can fool some of the people all of the time
--and those are the ones you have to concentrate on!"
GW Bush-- from the N.Y. Times





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page