Public SourceMage Discussion List

[nealbirch <nealbirch AT attbi.com>]

Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> can it be moved to initd then, or can we get a choice?
>
> Jeremy
>
> Dufflebunk wrote:
>
> > Samba via xinetd always generates lots of warnings in my log so I've
> > always run it from init. You might try a SIGHUP instead of a normal kill
> > to xinetd.
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 18:07, Jeremy Kolb wrote:
> >  
> >
> > > ever since samba was moved to being invoked by xinetd i have had 
> > > really weird problems. swat reports that samba is not turned on and i 
> > > can't access my shares, but i can mount other peoples shares.  but i 
> > > can only mount some of them, for some reason i can only access win2k 
> > > and xp shares when i put the samba logging level to 2 or more.  this 
> > > is really bizarre and i don't know why this is happening but it 
> > > started as soon as samba was switched to xinetd. im thinking this 
> > > might have be a bad idea (or maybe the scripts are screwy?). also to 
> > > restart samba requires that you restart xinetd (i haven't found a 
> > > better way to do this but im sure that there is).

I would say, we should have a choice. I havent' even tried to check 
samba before today, but it's hosed on my machine too.  argh... have to 
work on it later this week...


--
"You can fool some of the people all of the time
--and those are the ones you have to concentrate on!"
GW Bush-- from the N.Y. Times