sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Chris Brien" <christopher_brien AT hotmail.com>
- To: bobcottingham AT hotmail.com, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: bluebird AT optushome.com.au
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19
- Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 18:25:14 +0100
Yeah, yeah, I noticed last night (I have "finger @kernel.org" in my .bashrc), but my weekly bandwidth allocation (40 hours @ 56kbps) means I may not be able to download it till Monday - a couple of failed attempts at getting the last OpenOffice consumed that...
But I guess I have no excuse for not doing an update now? :o)
From: "Bob Cottingham" <bobcottingham AT hotmail.com>
This does beg the question of why the spell 'linux' is still there? It's only natural to assume that it's THE linux spell and will surely cause more confusion in the future as we gain new users. Does it still serve a purpose?
Yes, it does. In the future, the "linux" spell will be the one that actually builds a kernel. The others are just patches to your kernel source. eg, if you want preempt and xfs, you would cast linux-xfs and linux-preempt before casting linux.
See, I *have* been working on my section! :o)
Chris
aka zero_the_hero
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19
, (continued)
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Glenn Shannon, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Treeve Jelbert, 08/03/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19, Glenn Shannon, 08/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19, bluebird, 08/03/2002
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Eric Sandall, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Eric Sandall, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/03/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19, Glenn Shannon, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Eric Sandall, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Treeve Jelbert, 08/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19, Bob Cottingham, 08/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Chris Brien, 08/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19, Jon Svendsen, 08/03/2002
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] We have 2.4.19,
Glenn Shannon, 08/03/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.