Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-commit - Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by Puppet_Master (9c79633f4582f2eb48723a6ae39bcb84f8816461)

sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Source Mage code commit list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Philippe Caseiro <caseiro.philippe AT free.fr>
  • To: sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by Puppet_Master (9c79633f4582f2eb48723a6ae39bcb84f8816461)
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:22:44 +0200

Le Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:13:55 -0700,
Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> a _crit :

> Remko van der Vossen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:45:00AM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> >> Remko van der Vossen wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>> We don't use UPDATED anymore, also if you see it you can remove
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>> SOURCE_HASH is usually placed with SOURCE_URL, as one depends on
> >>> the other.
> >> You may technically only remove UPDATED when adding/incrementing
> >> PATCHLEVEL, SECURITY_PATCH, or VERSION.
> >
> > Ah ok, well that'll usually be the case, but is this documented
> > somewhere?
> >
> > Also, we've not been using UPDATED in a long time, right? I would
> > think all systems with spells installed from before the last
> > UPDATED increment would have long been updated. Could it do any
> > harm to automatically remove them now?
>
> There's no pressing issue to remove UPDATED, so I'd rather have it
> removed when warranted by the above reasons. The only documentation I
> recall is on SM-Discuss, but I'll add it to the GGH.
>
> -sandalle
>


Finaly the issue is : We no more use UPDATED ?? true ?


--
Philippe Caseiro




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page