Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-commit - Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 77905 by David Kowis for review

sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Source Mage code commit list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: SM-Commit Daemon <sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 77905 by David Kowis for review
  • Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:43:04 +0200

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:36:52AM -0500, David Kowis wrote:
> Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:45:02PM +0100, Perforce Review Daemon wrote:
> >> Change 77905 by david_kowis@dkowis-kain on 2006/04/18 14:42:58
> >>
> >> Adding REJECT flags to all the details
> >>
> >> Affected files ...
> >>
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-client/DETAILS#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-client/HISTORY#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-imap/DETAILS#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-imap/HISTORY#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-pop2/DETAILS#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-pop2/HISTORY#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-pop3/DETAILS#2 edit
> >> ... //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-pop3/HISTORY#2 edit
> >>
> >> Differences ...
> >>
> >> ==== //sgl/grimoires/z-rejected/z-mail/pine-client/DETAILS#2 (xtext) ====
> >>
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> >> ENTERED=20010922
> >> UPDATED=20030810
> >> LICENSE[0]=UW-PINE
> >> + REJECT="is not GPL free"
> >
> > I don't like that wording, since we don't require everything to be GPL
> > compatible. The one real problem with the pine license is that it only
> > allows distributing patches, not modified versions. The normal wording
> > for such spells in z-rejected is "has licensing issues", I think that's
> > better.
> >
>
> Yeah, we've had a small discussion on #sourcemage and in other emails.
> It reads "has licensing issues" now.
>
> But on a side note, the Social Contract says that we only include "GPL
> Compatible" spells. Needs to be reworded.

Yeah, that was brought up before, we need to reword that into Free
Software or something equivalent. GPL compatible is was too narrow to
build a system on.

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page