Developer Only Discussion List

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

Voted:
======
Eric Sandall
Andrew Stitt
Eric Schabell
Jose Bernardo
Kevin Dahan
Robin Cook (CuZnDragon)
Jason Flatt (Oadae)

To vote, just add your vote to the list (sum to a total in each vote)
and add your name to the list of already voted.
 
 Title                   old | new | totals
 ========================================
 For holding back 1.0:   +2    +1     +3
 For smaller meetings:   +2    +1     +3
 For more team meetings: +3    +1     +4
 
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 12:56:51PM -0800, Jason Flatt wrote:
> I'm assuming smaller meetings means shorter meetings, but smaller meetings 
> could also mean something like sorcery or security or tome team leader and 
> member only meetings, and team lead only meetings, which I also think is a 
> good idea.

I see it as meaning both, frequent small teem meetings and more frequent
full meetings. Team lead only meetings sounds like a good idea to me
too.

> If it means more and better communication, and if it means more people will 
> get in there and contribute to a meeting, then I'm all for more meetings, 
> and 
> I'm willing to do as much as I can (which may not be a lot) to help 
> facilitate it.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org