The *official* poly-p-ux mailing list

["Joseph Mulloy" <jdmulloy AT gmail.com>]

Hi Poly-p-man
Can you post the build root config file? I'm still having issues getting gcc to run. I get the following error messgae.

gcc: symbol '__ctypr_b': can't resolve symbol in lib 'gcc'.

I need all the configs to make sure everything is exactly the same. I need to get gcc working on this system.

Joseph Mulloy

jdmulloy AT gmail.com

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Joseph Mulloy <jdmulloy AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi again. I haven't made much progress with gcc or lilo. I did dig another old machine out of a closet. It's a 200MHz Pentium MMX. I took everything out of it before I put it away in the closet so I had to scrounge up a fan, memory, and a hard drive. I also upgraded the ram in a PIII system recently which freed up a 128MB stick, so now I have a PII class system with a 333MHz Celeron, 256MB of RAM (128MB + 64MB + 64MB), a 20 GB drive that came with the system that had it's ram upgraded and an AGP nVidia card from another machine that got a video card upgrade. I'm installing debian on it now, but I'm leaving room of the drive for other things, like poly-p-ux if needed. I've got plenty of hardware to work with, now all I need is that buidlroot .config file and working gcc on poly-p-ux. I also need to find more NICs, I know I have more, I just can't seem to find them.

Joseph Mulloy

jdmulloy AT gmail.com

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Joseph Mulloy <jdmulloy AT gmail.com> wrote:

Send your config file when you can. As soon as I get gcc working I'll trying getting lilo to work.

Joseph Mulloy

jdmulloy AT gmail.com

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Poly-p man <polypolyman AT ibiblio.org> wrote:

On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:18:52 am Joseph Mulloy wrote:
> As you probably already know, you can build an i386 version and load it on
> any system that supports at least the same instruction set. You can use the
> 486 or any other machine as a build machine and then load the finished
> product onto the 386. I know there were a lot of features added from i386
> up through i686 but if you want to get a release out the door, how about
> concentrating on just i386. An i386 build will run on any system, that way
> everyone can get something, then we can optimize. Config files would be
> good.

basically, config files are the only difference... I already have those :D

> I'm trying to get gcc to by coping it from an i386 build root image
> available from the uClibc website (the link is in the FAQ, Is a
> pre-compiled uClibc development system available?). I'll try to make a gcc
> package to make this easier.

meh... too hard... just use a buildroot (or anything else - lilo is mostly
bin86 code, if not entirely static anyway)...

It's not too hard to add arches, it's mostly hard to do the few packages that
are annoying... lilo, for example.

Tomorrow (I'll go to sleep soon - if motion detecting on the sixaxis doesn't
kill me first :D) I'll work on the release...

...btw, so far, 386 has given me troubles every time... back in the 0.20 days,
it actually killed my host system slowly to chroot into the system! This
time, I'm having a bit of trouble - I've been too lazy to try much, tho.

poly-p man
_______________________________________________
Poly-p-ux mailing list
Poly-p-ux AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/poly-p-ux