Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy

["Plemmons, Gregory" <gregory.plemmons AT Vanderbilt.Edu>]

I would also be interested in participating and leading, if needed.

All best,
Greg Plemmons



-----Original Message-----
From: Percy-L [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Charles 
Cowherd
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:45 PM
To: percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [percy-l] LITR Slow Read

All, 
   I would love to participate in the reading of "Love in the Ruins" and to 
lead a weekly discussion, if necessary. 
~ Charles R. Cowherd

-----Original Message-----
From: Percy-L [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of 
percy-l-request AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:00 PM
To: percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L Digest, Vol 107, Issue 13

Send Percy-L mailing list submissions to
        percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        percy-l-request AT lists.ibiblio.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        percy-l-owner AT lists.ibiblio.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Percy-L digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Walker Percy on the Cil War (RHONDA MCDONNELL)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:42:17 -0500
From: RHONDA MCDONNELL <rhonda_mcdonnell AT msn.com>
To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion"
        <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [percy-l] Walker Percy on the Cil War
Message-ID: <BAY407-EAS300ECDBEE5D9CD0AE52299CE41B0 AT phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

My understanding of a slow read is that we (the list) divide the novel up 
into sections (using Percy's divisions is natural).  Someone volunteers to be 
a "discussion leader" of sorts for each section.  We discuss one section a 
week (hence the term "slow read").  The discussion leader starts each week 
off with an initial post reflecting on that section.  As long as we remain 
connected to the text, I think it's fair to say that anything 
goes--connections to contemporary politics, politics in the 1970s, 
philosophy, science, Percy's other fiction, Percy's non-fiction, etc. 

It looks like (based on my kindle edition) that the sections are as follows:
1. July Fourth
2. July First
3. July Second
4. July Third
5. July Fourth (again)
6. Five Years Later

So over a period of six weeks, we'd engage in a spirited discussion of 
Percy's novel without straining those of us busy with other projects, 
academic or otherwise.

I'd happily take the first section and have an initial post up by Monday, 
June 30.

Then if five others would be willing to lead sections, we'd look for initial 
section posts on Sunday/Monday of each following week: Section 2 on July 6/7; 
Section 3 on July 13/14; Section 4 on July 20/21; Section 5 on July 27/28; 
and Section 6 on Aug. 3/4.

To me, it seems like a brilliant way to spend July during a time when the 
center is not holding.

Is anyone else game to take on a section?  

Rhonda


Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:21 PM, "Karl M. Terrell"
<kterrell AT stokeswagner.com> wrote:
> 
> In Love in the Ruins, Walker Percy described an imagined America in 
> which
we ?have turned against each other.?  He wrote, ?There are Left states and
Knothead states, Left towns and Knothead towns, but no center towns.?   
>  
> I agree certainly with the comments that Percy skewered both left and
right, and that it was not his intent to make a political statement, per se.
I agree with you that, if here today, he would skewer (for example) Mayor 
Bloomberg?s attempt to regulate the cup sizes of our favorite sugar beverages 
(and I would laugh right along).
>  
> Percy?s intent, at the political level, was to describe the potential 
> for
the disintegration of our ?beloved USA.?  This is reflected in his borrowing 
from Yeats? The Second Coming, when first describing the situation of the 
LeftPapas and Knotheads: ?The center did not hold,? Percy described.  (As 
Yeats spot-on put it, ?The ceremony of innocence is drowned / The best lack 
all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity?).
>  
> I know we shouldn?t drag the discussions on this list into a
political-bickering fest.  But, Percy did create his imaginary America out of 
the cloth of the country in which he lived, and so some degree of political 
comment, I think, is fair game.  He described, for example, the Knothead 
Party as derived from the ?old Republican Party,? and which initially called 
itself the Christian Conservative Constitutional Party (until someone pointed 
out the acronym ? CCCP ? is the same as that for the USSR in their alphabet). 
 ? And so, Percy pretty accurately foresaw the rise of the Tea Party, and the 
center failing to hold.
>  
> I perhaps fell victim to my own passions of the present era when
describing my personal disagreements with the current-day Knotheads.  I did 
not mean to offend, or drag this list into a political discussion.  And I can 
certainly agree not all Tea Partiers are racist ? but I can?t avoid my 
ability to observe (being old enough to remember Jim Crow and the attitudes 
then openly expressed, and knowing that such attitudes don?t just disappear) 
that there are still plenty of racists out there.  Unfortunately, for the Tea 
Party, it?s hard to deny that a lot of them have aligned themselves in your 
camp. 
>  
> You?re obviously an intelligent and thoughtful person.  I accept your
denial of racist motives on the part of the Tea Party you know, and I respect 
the fact you took offense at the suggestion of being lumped with racist 
cretins.  But to deny those cretins are out there is a mistake.
>  
> Someone made the suggestion of doing a ?slow read? of LITR on this list.
I don?t know how that works, but it sounds like a good idea to me.  I think 
spirited comment and comparison to present-day political realities would be 
appropriate, but I agree ?name-calling? should be avoided, and agree again 
that it was not Percy?s intent to advocate any particular political viewpoint.
> 
> Karl Montague Terrell
> 
>  
>  
> From: Percy-L [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
> janetcantor37--- via Percy-L
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:07 AM
> To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
> Subject: Re: [percy-l] Walker Percy on the Cil War
>  
> I have taken to answering some things in personal E-mails rather than
sullying the Lists with the mere political.
>  
> But, sir, you go too far.
>  
> I am a Tea Party member. I know dozens of other Tea Party members. I 
> have
NEVER met or known indirectly one member who, to use President Obama's 
phrase, has a smidgeon of racism in choosing to be a Tea Party member.
> When the president was elected, my liberal friend asked how I felt. I 
> told
her, "He is my president. I hope he does good work for the country and may 
G-d be with him."
>  
> If it makes you feel better or superior to state what you have said 
> here,
it is a free country and I would be the last one to try to stop you because 
as a Tea Party member we are about protecting individual freedom and 
remembering and honoring the Constitution and thus the Bill of Rights.
> Please, everybody, cease and desist from this name calling. I am no
liberal in my political persuasion. But I do not impugn the motives of 
liberals. I like to think liberals want what is best for this country and I 
would sincerely enjoy it so much better if the left would stop impugning my 
motives, because, believe me, sir, I have the best motives in the world.
> I want a return to Constitutional government, a return to smaller
government that does not make up new rights everyday.
> I do not believe Walker Percy would be pleased with all of this 
> business
of telling us what to eat, how to live, what the government has the right to 
do to us to keep us in line. And I will best Percy would not describe the 
knot heads as those who believe in an overweening government. I think that 
would disturb him no end. Read Father Smith in the Thanatos Syndrome warning 
us that "All tenderness leads to the gas chambers." I could write reams here. 
>  
> But I will just ask, please, stop calling others you disagree with names.
It always amazes me that liberals love to consider Tea Party people closed 
minded and savage. But do they ever listen to themselves? Listen to yourself, 
for example, Mr. Terrell. I do not insult you or your motives.
Please stop insulting mine.
> Respectfully,
> Janet Cantor
>  
> From: Karl M. Terrell <kterrell AT stokeswagner.com>
> To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion 
> <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [percy-l] Walker Percy on the Cil War
>  
> Well put, I say.  I have had Percy?s Knotheads on my mind ever since 
> the
emergence of the Tea Party, and the ?birthers,? and all the others viscerally 
at odds with the image of a black man in the White House. ** These folks are 
careful to avoid (most of the time) obvious racist comments, but racism is 
clearly driving them.
> I am currently re-reading (after 30 or more years) the Strange Career 
> of
Jim Crow by C. Vann Woodward, and Kenneth Stampp?s revisionist history 
(written in 1965) of Reconstruction.  Woodward teaches that Jim Crow didn?t 
erect himself until the 1890s, following a period in which ? relatively 
speaking ? there was a real progress in race relations.  Stampp points out 
that the South?s retrospective loathing of Reconstruction was distorted to an 
unwarranted extreme by histories written in 1890 ? 1910 sympathetic to
the fantasy of the patrician South.   
> There was, at that time in 1890 - 1910, growing sympathies in the 
> North to
the situation of the white man in the South vis a vis the Negro, prompted by 
(among other factors) xenophobic reactions in the North to immigration from 
southern and eastern Europe.  The sociology, anthropology and psychology 
popular at that time supported a racist view, as did the law (e.g., Plessy v 
Ferguson?s imprimatur of the demonstrably unsound and intellectually bankrupt 
notion of ?separate but equal?).  Racism was its height then.  The KKK 
re-emerged, the movie Birth of a Nation by D. W. Griffith, etc.
> These things come in waves.  Maybe the waves are weaker each time, but 
> the
Tea Party wave is very real.  It is full of people who, at its most nakedly 
obvious, are like that fellow out West, Clive Bunden I think is his name 
(?Now, let me tell you another thing about the Negro ??).  This wave could
grow larger ? particularly if the GOP takes the Senate in November.   Or
maybe they?ll just make bigger asses out of themselves, and it will all blow 
over.  That?s usually what happens.  It is, after all, what happened the last 
time around, mid-century, when the segregationists made their last stand
> In any event, we need Walker Percy, and his vision of the Knotheads.  
> I
like, therefore, what you said: ? Percy pointed to the power of irony to 
rescue us from this condition.  It highlights hypocrisy and contradiction for 
us.  It gives us a perspective outside of ourself to see ourselves and 
therein lies the possibility of freedom.?
>  ** I bet Percy would have loved Randy Newman?s ironic song released 
> during the 2012 election, I?m Dreaming of a White President (sung to 
> the tune of White Christmas)  Karl Montague Terrell
> 
>  
>  
> 
> From: Percy-L [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of 
> Wade Riddick
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:18 AM
> To: percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [percy-l] Walker Percy on the Cil War
>  
>  
> The Knots ARE the Tea Party, envisioned 30 - 40 years before they ever
came about.
> The knotheads - and thus the Tea Party - are not very new.  They are, 
> in
fact, very old.  They represent a strain of Southern self-righteousness that 
goes back well beyond the outbreak of the Civil War and trace themselves to 
the imagined courtliness of the planter classes who secretly believed 
confiscating the private property of black people by making them slaves was 
really a form of liberty.  These were enemies to the Constitution.
> 
> Rand Paul is a perfect example of the anti-liberty libertarian streak 
> still alive in the neofeudalists among us.  He believes,
> 
> 1)  Defending the value of the dollar is one of the most important 
> jobs of
the federal government.  This is why he's mad at the Federal Reserve.  He 
believes they're devaluing money by printing dollars (ignoring for the moment 
that he's been wrong about imminent inflation for six years now; money 
behaves differently in a depression, as Keynes proved).  The simple fact is 
money is a good like any other in that its price (the interest rate) can 
fluctuate due to demand.  This is not "devaluation" per se.
> 
> 2)  Paul believes it's anti-property rights to force businesses not to
discriminate on the basis of race (or sex or religion) when doing business 
with their customers.  He's against the public accommodations provisions of 
the civil rights era laws.  This is a David Duke-esque message of "reverse 
discrimination" or well-cultivated white Southern Christian victimhood 
designed to appeal to the militantly overprivileged rightwing Pharisees who 
now constitute his base.  This is why all these guys talk about succession 
and state's right and nullification and other imaginary concepts that never 
survived the 13th and 14th Amendments.  They're the sons and grandsons of the 
white citizenship councils and sovereignty commissions that Walker Percy 
loathed in the '60s and '70s and targeted squarely in _Love in the Ruins_.
> 
> Combine 1 + 2: Paul believes it's a top job of the government to 
> defend
the value of the greenback except when the hand holding it is black and then 
corporation can infinitely devalue it to zero.
> 
> What sense does that make?
> 
> It makes plenty of sense when you realize there's a long tradition in 
> the
South dating back to before _Dred Scot_ declaring that black people can't be 
American citizens and thus they're free targets (Obama's citizenship 
"controversy" fits into this pattern; they don't think he's a citizen for no 
other reason than the color of his skin, even if they can no longer say so 
openly).  I think this is why Percy was fascinated with Nazi death camps and 
the culture of death.  American racism in the South fit in a literary sense 
with religious and class warfare in Europe.
> 
> Rand Paul got his political theory from Ayn Rand who believed 
> Christianity
was for rubes and altruism was a form of delusion.  She literally worshipped 
psychopaths for their "will" - i.e., lack of conscience.  (Wouldn't that just 
tickle Goebbels who said, "Intellectual activity is a danger to the building 
of character?")  It's an irony but no mere coincidence that so many white 
Evangelical Christians now believe the same.  They're not Christians as much 
as they are Southern Nationalists in the stripe of Thomas Jefferson (an 
historical figure I've come to loath the more I age and read).
> 
> The modern Tea Party pushes for voting restrictions when the original 
> Tea
Party stood for no taxation without representation.
> 
> The fact is the modern Tea Party hates liberty.  Liberty isn't just 
> the freedom to do something like speak your mind - it's also the 
> obligation to use that freedom responsibly on behalf of a better 
> society.  Liberty, to paraphrase the founding fathers, is the 
> responsible exercise of self-government.  Tea Party anger is nothing 
> but incoherent id, barbarian-yawping like Jim Bond.  (Oh, God.  Stop 
> me from having another Faulkner episode.)  A true conservative 
> stresses social responsibility.  A true conservative doesn't lie about 
> science.  These people aren't conservatives.  They're radicals 
> hell-bent on overturning campaign finance laws so they can turn 
> America into a newly reborn plantation economy where we're all 
> corporate serfs.  Since the Civil War the South has had one central, 
> consistent response to economic development which is to drive down the 
> cost of labor - (infinitely to zero, in the case of slavery).  This is 
> the "moonlight and magnolias" economic strategy that fo
 cuses on tax credits/giveaways to rich businessmen because apparently they 
are lazy and have to be paid to make money and create jobs whereas workers 
have to be punished because they work for a living and thus are, well, in 
need of punishment.  (Refusing to accept matching Medicaid funds is a great 
example of believing it builds character to ration medical care to the
sick.)
> 
> Percy pointed to the power of irony to rescue us from this condition.  
> It
highlights hypocrisy and contradiction for us[1].  It gives us a perspective 
outside of ourself to see ourselves and therein lies the possibility of 
freedom.  Listen to John Kyl on the floor of the Senate saying with a 
straight face, "This may not be a factually true statement," and tell me the 
Republicans aren't so lost they no longer have even irony?
> 
> Being lost is the human condition.  It's when you think you've found
yourself all on your own that you are truly in the dark.  Anyone who's ever 
understood grace knows that.
> 
> Wade Riddick
> 
> 1.  Without this tension, "meaning" itself would be impossible; things
have to be different or "contradict" to fall into he same category and define 
a term.  You must have different colors like red and blue to have a concept 
of "color."  Percy was probably thinking of all of these linguistic currents 
and eddies as he was manipulating old Southern contradictions and ironies for 
his novels.
>  
> * Percy-L Discussion Archives: 
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/
> 
> * Manage Your Membership: 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l
> 
> * Contact the Moderator: percy-l-owner (at) lists.ibiblio.org
> 
> * Visit The Walker Percy Project: http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy
>  
> 
> * Percy-L Discussion Archives: 
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/
> 
> * Manage Your Membership: 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l
> 
> * Contact the Moderator: percy-l-owner (at) lists.ibiblio.org
> 
> * Visit The Walker Percy Project: http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/attachments/20140627/81f84e6f/at
tachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
* Percy-L Discussion Archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/

* Manage Your Membership: http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l

* Contact the Moderator: percy-l-owner (at) lists.ibiblio.org

* Visit The Walker Percy Project: http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Percy-L mailing list
Percy-L AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l


------------------------------

End of Percy-L Digest, Vol 107, Issue 13
****************************************

* Percy-L Discussion Archives: https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/

* Manage Your Membership: http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/percy-l

* Contact the Moderator: percy-l-owner (at) lists.ibiblio.org

* Visit The Walker Percy Project: http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy