Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

percy-l - Re: [percy-l] LITR Slow Reading List

percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tommy Armstrong" <tfa AT brickengraver.com>
  • To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [percy-l] LITR Slow Reading List
  • Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:11:01 -0400

Kewl--So I think to sum up we have decided that LITR is a go for a group
read. How about a chapter a week starting October 1st. Everyone have the
first chapter read by Oct 1 and discussion begins. Posts then start (or
before)with a subject line
"LITR Chapter 1" (no quotes) and the thread begins.

If you are using Outlook or other email clients, one can then filter
everything with LITR in its subject into a separate folder and then arrange
subject alphabetically. So for example when "Chapter 2" comes around, it
would sort below "Chapter 1". One would then use these subject lines for
comments on specific comments about that chapter. And then of course there
would be posts not specicfically associated with a certain chapter--Just
start that subject with LITR.

Now does anyone have the formula for the Gin Fizzes that he was drinking in
the opening chapter? I need to stock up on any ingredients before I start.

Tommy Armstrong

Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men trying to find
easier ways to do something.
Robert Heinlein




-----Original Message-----
From: percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Henry P. Mills
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:34 PM
To: percy-l
Subject: [percy-l] LITR Slow Reading List

Tommy et al,

Using Percy-L as a forum for a slow reading list of one of Percy's novels is
certainly appropriate and germane to the interests of the community. Those
not able to read along can still benefit from the discussion.

>From past experience I know that such discussions generally work best
>when
one or more persons works to keep the discussion moving forward anytime
there is an extended lull, for instance, by introducing another topic. That
person can be appointed, the role can be passed between members, or the
group can promote and maintain its own well-being. All discussion will of
course be automatically archived. My only suggestion would be that those
participating make certain that LITR appears in the title of each message,
and perhaps the chapter being discussed. That will make discussion much
easier to identify and follow. As with Percy-L, the discussion should follow
and adhere to the values of the list as earlier related, namely civil
discourse of the kind you would expect of readers of Percy.

Henry Mills


> From: Tommy Armstrong <tfa AT brickengraver.com>
> Reply-To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion"
> <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:55:16 -0400
> To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'"
> <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Subject: [percy-l] Group Read Suggestions??
>
> I would very much like to do this--especially since there are a lot
> more smarter people on this list than myself, and would very probably
> learn a great deal.
>
> What do you think Mr. Modrator?
>
> Come up with some very simple ground rules such as a standard subject
> line, a start time and schedule--"reasonable time" is one of the
> operative phrases here, and the list could give their suggestions.
> With POB all the novels were about the same length, but with Percy,
> some would obviously take longer than others. I am not sure about the
> novels of Percy and their pagination between different editions, but
> it did make for an easier discussion if most were using the same
> edition or at least if there was a cross reference to the quotation under
discussion.
>
> If it really got good, one could then compile all the posts about the
> book under discussion into a master document.
>
> The way it worked with POB was that pretty much anything was fair game
> as long as it came from the novel that was being read. Links to maps,
> definitions, historical material, etc. etc.
>
> For example the recipe of a "Gin Fizz" in Love in the Ruins.
>
> Tommy Armstrong
> PO Box 484
> Lillington, NC 27546
> http://www.brickengraver.com
>
> "If you're a big enough fool to climb a tree and like a cat refuse to
> come down, then someone who loves you has to make as big a fool of
> himself to rescue you."
> W Percy
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:percy-l-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Rhu
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [percy-l] Group Read --has it been done?
>
> Hello to all,
>
> I think is would very interesting to work through the novels at a
> reasonable pace as a sort of on-line/list reading group. As for the
> non-fiction, that strikes me as harder to organize for such a discussion
group.
>
> Also, for any of you out there who are looking to write conference
> papers about Percy, there is an annual comp lit conference at USC
(Columbia) in
> February. Its topic this year is "Cultures of Evil and the Attractions
of
> Villainy," which may make the experience of Tom More particlarly relevant.
> Would any of you be interested in putting together a panel on the two
> More novels and other relevant writings by Percy?
>
> Larry
>
> Lawrence F. Rhu
> Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature University
> of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208
> Tel: 803 777 0144
> Fax: 803 777 9064
> Email: rhul AT sc.edu
>
>>>> tfa AT brickengraver.com 09/17/05 1:53 PM >>>
> I was just wondering if anything like that had been done on the Percy
List.
> I was once a member of a Patrick O'Brian list and they did a "group
> read" of all of the Canon of 22 books that POB wrote--1 each two
> months if I remember. Would this be an appropriate use of this list.
> We used a kind of a standard subject line, such as "GroupRead Master
> and Commander" so that email clients could easily easily sort on just
> that thread. People who wished to participate did, those that did not
> simply filtered out that thread.
>
> I for one would love some sort of a stuctured way that would "force"
> me to go back through the Percy Canon--especially with some guidance
> from all the able bodied seamen that inhabit this ship.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Tommy Armstrong
> PO Box 484
> Lillington, NC 27546
> http://www.brickengraver.com <http://www.brickengraver.com/>
>
> ...with the method of science one beholds what is generally true about
> individuals, but art beholds what is uniquely true.
>
> Walker Percy
> Signposts in a Strange Land
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> --
> An archive of all list discussion is available at
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/
>
> Visit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy


--
An archive of all list discussion is available at
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/percy-l/

Visit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page