percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future? No, but it sure has a present...
- From: "Parlin, Steven" <PARLINS AT culver.org>
- To: "'Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion'" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future? No, but it sure has a present...
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:26:07 -0500
What's wrong with a little homonymousitalaciousness?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Armstrong [mailto:armstron AT ohiou.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
Subject: RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future? No, but it
sure has a present...
At 12:55 PM 10/8/2003 -0500, Steve Parlin wrote:
>
>This linguistic mishap is not due to the lack of real world referents
>(Piat and Forest), but to homonymous confusion with the first name, Jim.
I for one am against the confusion of all this homonymousitality.
Just for the record.
Ken A.
--
An archive of all list discussion is available at
http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail
Visit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy
- RE: [percy-l] Does Deconstruction Have a Future? No, but it sure has a present..., Parlin, Steven, 10/08/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.