percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
- From: "Bryon McLaughlin" <BMclaughlin AT nazarene.org>
- To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:21:13 -0500
Steve:
I guess you don’t truck with the “priesthood of all believers”—a Protestant tenant, when it comes to interpreting Scripture.
Bryon McLaughlin
-----Original Message-----
Karey,
Thanks for the reference. If I have time I'll see about getting around to reading it. It's always a good idea to know what's being said on such matters. But, really, this text and texts like it are of very little consequence when viewed against the backdrop of the authoritative Tradition of the Church, which is and always has been unambiguously clear about the immorality of homosexual acts.
Who cares what anyone else is saying about the scriptures? What authority do they have? None. Theologian or not, in the end, they have no credibility apart from the teaching body of the Church. Morover, on it's own, the Bible has absolutely no authoritative credibility apart from this authoritative tradition. On its own, it's a useless text. No, worse. On it's own its a dangerous text, and anyone can use it to forward just about any kind of hogwash they want. Form the back cover commentary: "The Bible has been used to justify slavery, inquisitions, apartheid, and the subjugation of women"
Now, one can certainly argue that the teaching body of the Church is full of crap and not divinely guided (even a lot of priests make this argument), but that won't nullify her God-given role as the only credible authority on scriptural matters. Whether one agrees with the Catholic Church or not, she is the only the authority on scripture.
Steve
|
-
[percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Karey L. Perkins, 09/20/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Karey L. Perkins, 09/20/2003
-
Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Benedikt, 09/21/2003
-
Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Ken Wilson, 09/21/2003
-
Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
David Alan Beck, 09/21/2003
-
Fallacious but true? Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Ken Armstrong, 09/22/2003
- Re: Fallacious but true? Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, David Alan Beck, 09/22/2003
-
Fallacious but true? Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Ken Armstrong, 09/22/2003
-
Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
David Alan Beck, 09/21/2003
- RE: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, Tim Cole, 09/21/2003
-
Re: Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Ken Wilson, 09/21/2003
-
Re[2]: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Benedikt, 09/21/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, Parlin, Steven, 09/24/2003
- RE: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, Bryon McLaughlin, 09/29/2003
- RE: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, Parlin, Steven, 09/29/2003
- RE: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux, Parlin, Steven, 09/30/2003
-
Re: [percy-l] homosexuality, redux,
Karey L. Perkins, 09/20/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.