percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy
List archive
Re: Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated, Based on Previous Discussions and Readings
- From: "Karey L. Perkins" <karey AT charter.net>
- To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated, Based on Previous Discussions and Readings
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:44:34 -0400
Steve,
I am interested in the Symposium -- can you tell me
how I can find out more about it? How long is it? What are the
events? Contact info?
Thanks,
Karey
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Dye
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: [percy-l] Re: Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated,
Based on Previous Discussions and Readings I can give out the phone number, address, etc. If anyone needs info, you can get it from the St. Tammany Parish Library in Covington. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karey L. Perkins" <karey AT charter.net> To: "Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion" <percy-l AT franklin.oit.unc.edu> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:52 PM Subject: [percy-l] Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated, Based on Previous Discussions and Readings > Our listserv seems to have been quiet, philosophically that is, ever since > our discussion of the Catholic priests -- too controversial? > > At any rate, in an effort to spark some more conversation, I wanted to post > some thoughts. As I continue on with my reading of Percy (again, his > philosophy is slower going than the fiction, but I'm making some progress), > many observations related to previous comments we've made come to mind. > Here are some of them, not necessarily related to each other, but pick and > choose as you will: > > **1) Regarding Nikki's question a few weeks ago related to our discussion of > "consciousness", and I don't remember it exactly, but something to the > effect of, "Why bother with this conversation at all?" or rather, "What is > the importance of this conversation?" that received only one or two replies: > I wasn't sure if it was intended as a rhetorical point (i.e.: this > conversation is unimportant), or if it was intended didactically (i.e.: > here's something you should be thinking about first before you ramble on > about this topic), or if it was intended as face-value question (i.e.: > literally, why is this conversation important?)....but, I'll > take it as the latter, and offer my observations: > > I think the topic and conversation, that is, Percy's idea of consciousness > as it relates to language and "who" or "what" man is, as well > as a materialistic or dualistic or monistic view of man, is extremely > important. I think it is at the root of Percy's fiction, and that his > "Theory of Man" drives all of his fiction. To decipher what that is is to > unravel the DNA code of what he was saying, you could say. Percy seemed to > write from a "plan," mapping out the plot and the book based on what he > wanted to say philosophically, and sticking to that, unlike other authors > like Flannery O'Connor, who may have had some kind of plan in the beginning > but ended up letting the book write itself. > > Percy differentiated man from the animals (as a scientist, he understood the > world - and items in the world - in terms of classification (finding > similarities) and differentiation) based on his capacity for language -- > symbol-mongering ability is an indication of consciousness, in Percy's mind. > Symbol mongering ability, a triadic event, is also what creates a "world" as > opposed to "environment" of merely behaviorist physical organisms relating > in a stimulus-response dyadic mode. A world has "magic" and "myth." This > is mostly from Message in the Bottle, but I found it interesting that Percy > uses these words, as he was a scientist, but especially as it relates to a > conversation with a physical-materialistic friend of mine, who believes the > physical world is all there is -- when the body dies, consciousness ends -- > then, upon further questioning, proceeded to describe "consciousness" as > some kind of "magic" (same word as Percy) that arose as the physical world > (and man) evolved. > > Another point: what man is, as would be described in a "Theory of Man" not > only drives Percy's fiction and all of his interests, but it determines our > purpose and meaning for living, and therefore, all our actions and decisions > in how we live our lives. > > By the way, I mentioned the article on autism as it provided a scientific > view of the mind, rather than just philosophical, and how language related > to that, which relates to Percy's theories. That notwithstanding, I was > interested to hear Wade's account of his illness, which seemed to me rather > eerily similar to Percy's themes -- esp. in Thanatos Syndrome. Something's > "wrong with the water"... or more accurately, in today's (postmodern) world, > our means of sustenance, our world, is from anonymous sources -- our > community is one created and provided by strangers, who provide us food and > water, who create and build our homes and businesses, and we share all of > that with other strangers. Great stuff for a novel -- but more true than > Percy realized? > > **2) If Percy is a "monist" as he seems to be -- did he ever identify > himself as such? If not, why not? > > **3) Percy and gender: Percy, like most good writers, was a product of his > culture: a well-to-do, aristocratic Southern white male living in the > latter half of the twentieth century (or rather, most of it, as he was born > and raised in the early half, just wrote in the latter half) -- but his > comments/views/themes/ideas rise above his demographics (and especially so > for Percy as his concern was what it means to be human) to say something of > importance to everyone. I think specifically here, as an example, of Ralph > Ellison's Invisible Man, which was about a black Southern male, and while as > a white female (not Southern), I could not identify with many of the > SPECIFICS of his experience, because Ellison's work was true and good, it > speaks on many levels of many truths about life, society, culture, what it > means to be human (which is why it is a classic). > > All that is to say is that Percy's portrayal of women changes through the > years, indicating that he was affected by his times -- and he had the > attitude and view towards women that indicates his demographics. In "The > Moviegoer" his female characters are flatter -- Kate is more well-developed, > but Sharon is stereotyped and seen from a preppy Southern white male > viewpoint (to stereotype about preppy Southern white men, that is). While > she is true to type, she is an object. This is right after the fifties -- a > decade where many intelligent women suffered from role restrictions (not > just professional but cultural and social) and a decade which brought the > inevitable sexual revolution of the sixties (it WAS a revolt, in fact). > Remember, many intelligent female writers went crazy and killed themselves > during this decade as they tried to stifle their intelligence and uniqueness > to conform socially. "The Last Gentleman" doesn't improve much on female > roles (and I don't really like any of the women in LG, though I liked Kate > in MG). Women still are primarily just "objects" of the protagonists' > emotional and sexual desire. The same in "Love in the Ruins," where we have > three women who are objects of his desire -- but otherwise, largely > insignificant and unimportant - remaining on the periphery > (marginalized?). > > However, ironically, at the end of Percy's books, > his protagonists find their resolution and "salvation" -- > on earth, that is, and perhaps only temporary -- in the arms and home of a > "good" woman. A "good" woman, for Percy, is practical, grounded, > traditional, and sexually and morally conservative. In addition, these > "good" women "call" Percy's heroes on their faults (chastise them)...they > don't let them get away with anything. This is something of a motherly > quality, so I'm wondering if any critics have written anything about a > madonna (mother)-whore complex or theme in Percy's writing. > > Women are occasionally the carriers of the "fugue state" even more than the > men, if they are not "good" as defined previously. Kate in MG, and Allison > in SC. Perhaps Anna in Lancelot. I think this is when Percy is most > successful in his portrayal of women. I think his other "type" of the good > woman that his protagonists end up with is influenced so significantly by > his culture that it has less universal truth than other things he has to > say. > > The Second Coming is the only book (that I noticed) in which he writes at > least part of it from a female point of view. This is his second to last > book, and women are becoming more rounded, more realistic, and less > objectified in Percy's writing, as the society in general in which Percy > lives and writes becomes more liberated for women. What surprised > me is that he wrote her (Allison's) point of view so well. > > I've chosen not to do the dissertation on Percy's female characters -- not > only because there's already a book out (which I've not yet read) about that > topic that probably says it better, but because I don't think that's the > most important thing he has to say. > > But I do have a question for the listserv -- how many of us are women? I > think female Percy fans are greatly the minority -- he appeals more to men, > it has been my experience, despite the fact that he says something to > everyone. > > **4) Percy's theology: It seems that Percy writes from a Christian > existentialist viewpoint. Most of his books seem to be about deconstructing > all of our illusions about ourselves -- our habits, lifestyles, goals, that > we think are meaningful -- and deconstructing our "false" or temporary > reasons for living or being in the world, which, I take it, is anything > except God. While he doesn't mention God or Christ too much (God > occasionally pops up, like Tom More "eating Christ" in LR, and Will Barrett > searching for a sign of God in SC), the books are focusing on that place > right before we find God -- before the leap -- when we realize what we ARE > living for doesn't really work, isn't really what it's all about. > > That's all well and good. I agree with him whole-heartedly. But where I'm > struggling is that, after presenting to us this nice Christian > existentialist viewpoint, Percy has each of his characters end up with > some "good woman" in an idyllic type Garden of Eden -- whether a cabin in > Virginia (Lancelot) or a greenhouse community/business in NC (SC). His > endings are more individual/couple in his first books (our hero with his > woman secluded from the world), and end in a more communal Garden of > Eden/"utopia" in later works (our hero and his woman creating the community > that helps others). The only exception to this pattern is the Last > Gentleman. > > Is this a contradiction in Percy's message? I'm not arguing that his > protagonists should all end up as a prophet/hermit in the desert, alone with > God, a voice crying out in the wilderness, having flung off the trappings of > the world, but it seems that Percy could be saying the purpose in life, the > road to bliss and sanity, is in settling down with a good woman in a > leafy enclave and living a moral life. Where's God? > > **5) Percy's reading and the Internet: For an Internet project listing the > books Percy has read, I would suggest beginning by flipping through each > page of Message in the Bottle, and his other non-fiction too, but > especially MB. He lists dozens of people he's read -- by no means > a complete listing but a good place to start. > > **6) Books: I can find "Thief of Pierce" on the Internet, but can't find > Ken Ketner's "His Glassy Essence" which was recommended earlier. > Any ideas on how to get a hold of a copy? > > Just some thoughts. > > Karey > > Karey L. Perkins > Professor of General Education > DeVry University > 2555 Northwinds Parkway > Alpharetta, GA 30004 > 770-521-4900 Ext. 3527 > www.atl.devry.edu/kperkins > > > > > > > > -- > An archive of all list discussion is available at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>. > Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>. > -- An archive of all list discussion is available at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>. Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>. |
-
Re: Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated, Based on Previous Discussions and Readings,
Steve Dye, 09/12/2002
- Re: Some Random Thoughts, Largely Unrelated, Based on Previous Discussions and Readings, Karey L. Perkins, 09/12/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.